14 January 2016, Business Green, New York State to phase out coal by 2020 in bid to become ‘international capital’ for clean energy. Governor Andrew Cuomo’s new environmental package also includes $15m fund for training workers in solar installation and technology. New York’s State Governor Andrew Cuomo yesterday announced plans for the US state to eliminate all use of coal by 2020 as part of a new environmental package designed to accelerate New York’s transition away from fossil fuels and towards wind and solar power. The environmental package, which was announced during Cuomo’s State of the State address, will see the state’s remaining coal-fired power stations close or transition to cleaner fuels within the next four years. The package also contains plans for a significant expansion of the State’s solar industry, with the installation of solar panels on more than 150,000 homes and businesses in the state and a $15m funding pot to train workers for solar installation and technology. Last month Cuomo set new clean energy mandates for New York – the new Clean Energy Standard will require the state to source at least 50 per cent of its electricity from renewables by 2030. Cuomo said he wants New York to become the “international capital” for clean energy. “The problem of climate change is finally being recognized by most world leaders, anyway,” he said. “Here in New York we have already been actively working to address it. Now, New York State has a business and an environmental opportunity. Let’s become the international capital for clean and green energy products.” The news was welcomed by New York’s director of the environment Heather Leibowitz, who said the measures would help lead the way in the fight against climate change. “The governor’s action will accelerate New York’s transition away from polluting fuels and towards efficient use of clean power from the wind and the sun. This means cleaner air for families, less global warming pollution, more stable electricity bills, and a stronger economy,” she said. Read More here
Category Archives: Cities Response
1 December 2015, The Conversation, When climate change hits our food supply, city foodbowls could come to the rescue. Australians may need to get used to coping with more disruptions to their food supply and rising food prices in a warming climate. But the food produced near our cities – our “city foodbowls” – could play a vital role in increasing the resilience of our food supply, as discussed in a new briefing from our Foodprint Melbourne project. The urban fringes of Australia’s major cities are some of the most productive agricultural regions in Australia. They also have access to valuable urban waste streams to support food production, including recycled water from city water treatment plants and desalination plants. Nonetheless, Australia’s city foodbowls are at risk of urban development, and the opportunity to develop them as climate resilient foodbowls could be lost unless their value is recognised in metropolitan planning policy. Climate shock The Queensland floods of 2010-11 showed how a sudden extreme weather event could disrupt a city’s food supply. Major transport routes to Brisbane and other cities were cut off and supermarkets began to run short of some food. And the Millennium Drought demonstrated the impact that drought could have on food prices, when fruit prices in Australia increased 43% between 2005 and 2007, and vegetable prices by around 33%. Climate change is expected to reduce the capacity for food production across southern Australia due to water scarcity, increasing temperatures and more frequent extreme weather events. Read More here
16 November 2016, Science Daily, Study ranks six American cities on preparation for climate change. A new study assesses the factors that affect climate change adaptation and ranks six American cities, finding that Portland, Boston and Los Angeles are all in the advanced to middle stages of planning for extreme weather events linked to climate change while Raleigh and Tucson are in the early to middle stages. Tampa, a city that is at the highest risk for hurricanes in the United States, was at the bottom of the list with little or no planning for the shifting risks due to climate change, according to researchers at Milken Institute School of Public Health (Milken Institute SPH) at the George Washington University. This study, which is a first of a kind, found that the political culture of a given city could affect how well city officials moved to prepare for extreme weather. “Tampa is vulnerable to climate change and associated extreme weather,” says lead author Sabrina McCormick, PhD, an associate professor of environmental and occupational health at Milken Institute SPH. “Despite this risk, Florida’s political representatives remain largely unconcerned about climate change.” Without the political will or public education, city decision-makers interviewed said that Tampa was one of the least prepared cities in the nation. McCormick notes that more than 125,000 residents of the Tampa area live below the flood line and would face great danger during the next big hurricane that hits the Tampa coastline. The study is the first to look at societal factors, such as the political environment, and how they affect a city’s ability to act on climate change. “This research is critical to moving cities forward in addressing climate impacts so that economic risk can be reduced and human health can be protected,” McCormick and her co-author report. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and others, climate change will lead to a number of human health threats that range from premature death or injuries caused by wildfires or hurricanes to post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health issues triggered by natural disasters. Read More here
9 November 2015, Renew Economy, Graph of the Day: Cities under water at 2°C and 4°C. Around half a billion people are at risk from sea level rise if the world continues on a business-as-usual path for carbon emissions, a new report has found – while limiting warming to the recommended 2°C would cut this risk by more than half. The US report by Climate Central, accompanied by an online interactive mapping system, shows that carbon emissions causing 4°C of warming – what business-as-usual points toward today – could lock in enough sea level rise to submerge land currently home to 470 to 760 million people as the “unstoppable rise” unfolds over centuries. The research also reveals, however, that aggressive carbon cuts limiting warming to 2°C could bring the number as low as 130 million people. The report – authored by Climate Central scientists Benjamin Strauss and Scott Kulp, and Anders Levermann of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research – assesses implications for all coastal nations and cities – post-2100 – using relationships between warming caused by carbon emissions, the long-term global sea level rise it locks in, and global elevation and population data. The news is worst for China, which is found to be most at risk with 145 million people living on land ultimately threatened by rising seas if emission levels are not reduced. Below are the mapped projections for Shanghai, at 4°C on the left, and 2°C on the right. Read More here